Reasoning with !-graphs
نویسنده
چکیده
The aim of this thesis is to present an extension to the string graphs of Dixon, Duncan and Kissinger that allows the finite representation of certain infinite families of graphs and graph rewrite rules, and to demonstrate that a logic can be built on this to allow the formalisation of inductive proofs in the string diagrams of compact closed and traced symmetric monoidal categories. String diagrams provide an intuitive method for reasoning about monoidal categories. However, this does not negate the ability for those using them to make mistakes in proofs. To this end, there is a project (Quantomatic) to build a proof assistant for string diagrams, at least for those based on categories with a notion of trace. The development of string graphs has provided a combinatorial formalisation of string diagrams, laying the foundations for this project. The prevalence of commutative Frobenius algebras (CFAs) in quantum information theory, a major application area of these diagrams, has led to the use of variable-arity nodes as a shorthand for normalised networks of Frobenius algebra morphisms, so-called “spider notation”. This notation greatly eases reasoning with CFAs, but string graphs are inadequate to properly encode this reasoning. This dissertation firstly extends string graphs to allow for variable-arity nodes to be represented at all, and then introduces !-box notation – and structures to encode it – to represent string graph equations containing repeated subgraphs, where the number of repetitions is abitrary. This can be used to represent, for example, the “spider law” of CFAs, allowing two spiders to be merged, as well as the much more complex generalised bialgebra law that can arise from two interacting CFAs. This work then demonstrates how we can reason directly about !-graphs, viewed as (typically infinite) families of string graphs. Of particular note is the presentation of a form of graph-based induction, allowing the formal encoding of proofs that previously could only be represented as a mix of string diagrams and explanatory text.
منابع مشابه
A Logical Investigation of Heterogeneous Reasoning with Graphs in Elementary Economics
Heterogeneous reasoning, which combines various sentential, diagrammatic, and graphical representations, is a salient component of logic, mathematics, and computer science. Another remarkable field in which it is applied is economics. In economics, various functions such as supply and demand functions are represented by graphs, which are used to explain and derive economic laws. In this paper, ...
متن کاملConcept Graphs without Negations: Standardmodels and Standardgraphs
In this article, we provide different possibilities for doing reasoning on simple concept(ual) graphs without negations or nestings. First of all, we have on the graphs the usual semantical entailment relation |=, and we consider the restriction ` of the calculus for concept graph with cuts, which has been introduced in [Da02], to the system of concept graphs without cuts. Secondly, we introduc...
متن کاملConceptual graphs at work : efficient reasoning and applications
This thesis describes original research in the field of knowledge representation and reasoning by presenting novel extensions to the Conceptual Graphs Model, which increase their reasoning capabilities and conceptual modelling applicability in Artificial Intelligence. Conceptual Graphs benefit from graph-based reasoning mechanisms, plug-in capabilities over existing data structures and good vis...
متن کاملEncoding !-tensors as !-graphs with neighbourhood orders
Diagrammatic reasoning using string diagrams provides an intuitive language for reasoning about morphisms in a symmetric monoidal category. To allow working with infinite families of string diagrams, !-graphs were introduced as a method to mark repeated structure inside a diagram. This led to !-graphs being implemented in the diagrammatic proof assistant Quantomatic. Having a partially automate...
متن کاملExploring, Reasoning with and Validating Directed Graphs by Applying Formal Concept Analysis to Conceptual Graphs
Although tools exist to aid practitioners in the construction of directed graphs typified by Conceptual Graphs (CGs), it is still quite possible for them to draw the wrong model, mistakenly or otherwise. In larger or more complex CGs it is furthermore often difficult–without close inspection–to see clearly the key features of the model. This paper thereby presents a formal method, based on the ...
متن کاملInference Graphs: A New Kind of Hybrid Reasoning System
Hybrid reasoners combine multiple types of reasoning, usually subsumption and Prolog-style resolution. We outline a system which combines natural deduction and subsumption reasoning using Inference Graphs implementing a Logic of Arbitrary and Indefinite Objects.
متن کاملذخیره در منابع من
با ذخیره ی این منبع در منابع من، دسترسی به آن را برای استفاده های بعدی آسان تر کنید
عنوان ژورنال:
- CoRR
دوره abs/1403.7828 شماره
صفحات -
تاریخ انتشار 2013